IL nostro 1TL quando leggera' questa notizia sara' distrutto...
|
Ma le associazioni dei maschi insorgono: uomini discriminati
Sesso con una donna ubriaca? E' stupro
Nuove norme nel codice penale britannico per contrastare il fenomeno delle violenze su persone non consenzienti
|
|
LONDRA (Gran Bretagna) - In Gran Bretagna il sesso con una donna ubriaca sarà considerato automaticamente stupro. Lo prevede una modifica del codice penale, messa a punto dal governo Blair nella speranza di fronteggiare una piaga crescente. Finora soltanto un caso su venti termina con la condanna dello stupratore e il fatto che la donna abbia alzato il gomito diventa spesso in tribunale un'attenuante.
I TEST DEL SANGUE - Nel prossimo futuro la musica dovrebbe cambiare totalmente: una donna in preda all'alcol sarà giudicata a tutti gli effetti incapace di intendere e volere. Quando una donna denuncerà una violenza sessuale la polizia dovrà procedere subito ad un test del sangue e delle urine. Se il tasso alcolico risulterà elevato l'uomo tirato in ballo non potrà più difendersi con la scusa di averlo fatto con lei consenziente e sarà automaticamente messo sotto inchiesta per stupro.
LE STATISTICHE - Con la modifica del codice penale il ministero degli Interni punta palesemente a scoraggiare il più possibile rapporti intimi con donne che abbiano bevuto troppo. Secondo le statistiche disponibili la stragrande maggioranza delle donne che nel Regno Unito si rivolgono alla polizia per uno stupro raccontano di aver subito la violenza dopo abbondanti libagioni. Grazie ai test del sangue e delle urine gli esperti si dicono in grado di stabilire che cosa una donna abbia ingurgitato di alcolico fino a tre giorni prima.
PARERI DISCORDANTI - Non tutti sono d'accordo con la novità in arrivo. George McAlylay, presidente di un movimenti in difesa dei maschi, Uk Men's Movement, prevede che non funzionerà: «Come si accerterà quando una donna ha perso il potere di autodeterminazione? Si introduce anche una discriminazione. Un uomo che beve rimane responsabile delle proprie azioni, una donna no».
|

Violence has always been associated with football since the origination of the game and its ancestors, dating back to 225 BC.
Essentially pitched battles between the youth of rival villages and towns, (most often played on Shrove Tuesdays and other Holy Days) Medieval football matches involved literally hundreds of men, sometimes in excess of 1000, and were commonly used as an occasion to settle arguments, personal differences and disputes over land. Rules existed purely on a local basis.
The presence of a ball, in the form of a leather-bound inflated pig's bladder, which could be thrown or kicked, was almost incidental to this semi-lawful opportunity for settling old scores, long running feuds and violent behaviour towards the other side.
Forms of football existed in other European countries too, like Germany and Italy but the roots of the modern game however, are to be found firmly in these ancient English traditions, which were often accompanied by extended bouts of drinking and quite regularly resulted in serious injuries and even death to some of the participants.
The acceptance of violence in the sport was not, however, widespread and by the early 14th century there were calls for regulations to be placed into the game. These requests arose not because of the violent nature of the game at the time, but because of the fact that, on match days it was prising local citizens away from market towns, and it was therefore bad for business.
By this time the game now had a bad reputation among English royalty. Not just for its extreme violence but also because of the excessive noise made by the spectators. King Edward III banned the game, not only because of its violence and noise but for military reasons too. The game had become so popular that it was distracting members of the military from undertaking their archery practice. King Henry IV and Henry VIII also passed laws against the sport, and Queen Elizabeth I even had football players jailed for up to a week.
Nonetheless, laws failed to slow down the popularity of football in the country and by 1681 it received official sanction in England. However, the standard of the game had not changed. The matches were still vicious and boisterous, with players hardly ever leaving the field without being injured or in some circumstances even killed. The sizes of each team and the field in which they played on were ignored and unorganised.
Modern forms of football emerged as the folk versions of the game were regulated and became more restrained. The much more disciplined game introduced to continental Europe in the 1900's was this newly refined contest, imported from the sport now played by the English upper classes.
Other countries all over Europe began implementing this form of the game, associated with Victorian values of fair play and re-educated enthusiasm. The transformation of the game itself from an uncontrolled battle on an imprecise field to a modern harmonised sport came largely as a result of the game moving to small arenas in built up cities.
However only two periods in British history have been relatively free of football-related violence: the inter-war years and the decade following the Second World War. This is mainly due to a phenomenon that still exists in the game today, "Football Hooliganism". Unlike early on in the game's history football hooliganism does not involve violence between members of opposing teams but in actual fact violence between rival supporters.Violence has always been associated with football since the origination of the game and its ancestors, dating back to 225 BC.
Essentially pitched battles between the youth of rival villages and towns, (most often played on Shrove Tuesdays and other Holy Days) Medieval football matches involved literally hundreds of men, sometimes in excess of 1000, and were commonly used as an occasion to settle arguments, personal differences and disputes over land. Rules existed purely on a local basis.
The presence of a ball, in the form of a leather-bound inflated pig's bladder, which could be thrown or kicked, was almost incidental to this semi-lawful opportunity for settling old scores, long running feuds and violent behaviour towards the other side.
Forms of football existed in other European countries too, like Germany and Italy but the roots of the modern game however, are to be found firmly in these ancient English traditions, which were often accompanied by extended bouts of drinking and quite regularly resulted in serious injuries and even death to some of the participants.
The acceptance of violence in the sport was not, however, widespread and by the early 14th century there were calls for regulations to be placed into the game. These requests arose not because of the violent nature of the game at the time, but because of the fact that, on match days it was prising local citizens away from market towns, and it was therefore bad for business.
By this time the game now had a bad reputation among English royalty. Not just for its extreme violence but also because of the excessive noise made by the spectators. King Edward III banned the game, not only because of its violence and noise but for military reasons too. The game had become so popular that it was distracting members of the military from undertaking their archery practice. King Henry IV and Henry VIII also passed laws against the sport, and Queen Elizabeth I even had football players jailed for up to a week.
Nonetheless, laws failed to slow down the popularity of football in the country and by 1681 it received official sanction in England. However, the standard of the game had not changed. The matches were still vicious and boisterous, with players hardly ever leaving the field without being injured or in some circumstances even killed. The sizes of each team and the field in which they played on were ignored and unorganised.
Modern forms of football emerged as the folk versions of the game were regulated and became more restrained. The much more disciplined game introduced to continental Europe in the 1900's was this newly refined contest, imported from the sport now played by the English upper classes.
Other countries all over Europe began implementing this form of the game, associated with Victorian values of fair play and re-educated enthusiasm. The transformation of the game itself from an uncontrolled battle on an imprecise field to a modern harmonised sport came largely as a result of the game moving to small arenas in built up cities.
However only two periods in British history have been relatively free of football-related violence: the inter-war years and the decade following the Second World War. This is mainly due to a phenomenon that still exists in the game today, "Football Hooliganism". Unlike early on in the game's history football hooliganism does not involve violence between members of opposing teams but in actual fact violence between rival supporters.
Considerando che domani il vostro 1TL sara' col solito pesante hangover post-giovedi sera e in ufficio sara' una giornata MOOOLTO particolare(ho gia' preparato 15 lattine di Foster's), meglio prevenire.......faccio gli auguri a tutti(o quasi) e me ne sto in ferie fino al 4/01/2007......Buon Natale!
Il chiosco di 1DST..

BRITAIN'S worst drink driver will spend Christmas in jail after being caught drunk behind the wheel for the 33rd time.
Decorator Howard Bloor was locked up for five months for being almost twice the legal limit.
Widower Bloor, 63, of Eccles, Manchester, was first caught in 1966 and has not been able to drive legally since then.
This time he was pulled over by police and claimed he had only had a couple of pints. Road safety groups want him to meet drunk drive victims to help stop him re-offending.
Road Peace said: "I think it's disgraceful that things have gone so far."
|
Mersey football thief is jailed
|
||
A man who pleaded guilty to breaking into the homes of six footballers has been jailed at Liverpool Crown Court. James Birch, 20, from Tuebrook, Liverpool, admitted breaking into the home of Liverpool goalkeeper Jerzy Dudek in Caldy, Merseyside, in June. He also pleaded guilty to a second burglary, and asked the court to take into account seven more - five at the homes of other Premiership stars. Birch was sentenced to two and a half years in a Young Offenders Institution. |
||
source BBC SPORTS (link)